Betekenis van:
aftermath

aftermath
Zelfstandig naamwoord
  • onaangename nawerking
  • the consequences of an event (especially a catastrophic event)
"the aftermath of war"

Synoniemen

Hyperoniemen

aftermath
Zelfstandig naamwoord
    • the outcome of an event especially as relative to an individual

    Synoniemen

    Hyperoniemen

    Hyponiemen


    Voorbeeldzinnen

    1. In aftermath of the accident he lost his sight.
    2. There was no electricity for two days in the aftermath of the typhoon.
    3. Throughout the aftermath of the explosion, Jason's easiness unsettled the survivors.
    4. The main challenges Ireland currently faces arise from the aftermath of the housing boom and the financial crisis.
    5. This ratio of 21 % corresponds to the number of Sabena jobs which could be saved by launching SN Brussels Airlines in the aftermath of Sabena’s bankruptcy.
    6. In addition, account shall be taken of the particular difficulties of countries dealing with the aftermath of conflict or natural disaster; and’;
    7. A failure of the third privatisation round would have endangered the bank and might in the aftermath even have led to BB’S insolvency, triggering Ausfallhaftung.
    8. Furthermore, in the aftermath of the events of 11 September 2001, several insurance companies reduced their exposure vis-à-vis their clients and imposed stricter conditions on Alstom for the granting of bonds.
    9. The reported noble gas measurements of different teams in the aftermath of the DPRK event on 9 October 2006 have demonstrated the feasibility of radio-xenon measurements and the usefulness of these data for verification purposes.
    10. for the fraudulent elections and referendum in Belarus on 17 October 2004 and those who are responsible for severe human rights violations in the repression of peaceful demonstrators in the aftermath of the elections and referendum in Belarus, as listed in Annex II;
    11. for the fraudulent elections and referendum in Belarus on 17 October 2004 and those who are responsible for severe human rights violations in the repression of peaceful demonstrators in the aftermath of the elections and referendum in Belarus, as listed in Annex II.’.
    12. The scope of the restrictive measures imposed by Common Position 2004/661/CFSP should therefore be expanded to persons who are directly responsible for the fraudulent elections and referendum in Belarus on 17 October 2004 and those who are responsible for severe human rights violations in the repression of peaceful demonstrators in the aftermath of the elections and referendum in Belarus.
    13. enable the Member States to give their opinions on the broad responses required to meet the demographic challenge and on the specific initiatives resulting from the Communication of 12 October 2006 on the demographic future of Europe and its aftermath, in particular in the fields that are not already well covered by the existing committees and advisory groups,
    14. On 13 December 2004, the Council adopted Common Position 2004/848/CFSP amending Common Position 2004/661/CFSP [2] in order to expand the scope of the restrictive measures to persons directly responsible for the fraudulent elections and referendum in Belarus on 17 October 2004 and those who are responsible for severe human rights violations in the repression of peaceful demonstrators in the aftermath of the elections and referendum in Belarus.
    15. The restrictive measures against the persons who are directly responsible for the fraudulent elections and referendum in Belarus on 17 October 2004 and those who are responsible for severe human rights violations in the repression of peaceful demonstrators in the aftermath of the elections and referendum, should be reviewed in the light of reforms made to the Electoral Code to bring it into line with OSCE commitments and other international standards for democratic elections as recommended by the OSCE/ODIHR, and in the light of concrete actions by the authorities to respect human rights with regard to peaceful demonstrations.